113 lines
6.5 KiB
Markdown
113 lines
6.5 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
title: "Information Scarcity"
|
|
date: 2024-03-01T21:55:39+01:00
|
|
tags: ["internet", "internet_security"]
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
I will not be picking battles between the extreme right or left side of the
|
|
political spectrum. In fact, I will merely try to report on the negative
|
|
impacts that capitalism has had on this astounding technology, referred to as
|
|
"the internet". I will also try to stay away from emotional writing, even if
|
|
such a technology lies very close to my heart. This does not mean I side with
|
|
left nor right. This means the common individual should focus more on the
|
|
problem at hand and come up with the best possible solution for that specific
|
|
scenario rather than just falling onto the extreme left or right wing.
|
|
|
|
This is especially true for developers..
|
|
|
|
We live in a world where money is power. That fact should not be ignored. The
|
|
creation of internet was an unexpected turn for the market. Companies realized
|
|
that it was a powerful tool to gain new customers with. And of course, how
|
|
could it not be? You are more exposed to the new customers' eyes and are
|
|
therefore, more likely to make more sales and profit, right? How could have
|
|
that possibly turned for the worse?
|
|
|
|
## Data Protection
|
|
|
|
The internet that we live in today is a mess. Service creation -> data
|
|
collection -> data breach. In that order. Service creation refers to any act of
|
|
writing or shipping software for the end-user (or the end-developer depending
|
|
on what you are creating). Data collection refers to the collection of
|
|
personally identifiable information without explicit or full consent from the
|
|
user (which, let's be real, is the case in 2024. Well, unless you are keen on
|
|
reading the 2000 word long privacy policy for every product that you use, which
|
|
can be changed by the company at any time of the day. Without your consent.
|
|
Have fun reading these vague essays). Data breach refers to the unescapable
|
|
information compromise that will happen sooner or later in the process of
|
|
shipping software to a wider audience. Production code is never 100% safe and
|
|
free from security vulnerabilities. Therefore, every time a maliscious user
|
|
discovers an unknown vulnerability, a potential data breach is about to take
|
|
place. The possible outcomes range from absolutely nothing to the total data
|
|
compromise for the users.
|
|
|
|
Sometimes I find myself questioning the intelect of the people who create
|
|
solutions to simple problems, yet feel this internal need to surround the
|
|
solution with software rubbish. Perhaps you have noticed that many websites
|
|
nowadays require account creation with a personally identifiable email address,
|
|
phone number, gender, address, and much more. Most of such websites deal with
|
|
problems whose core solution is SIMPLIFICATION, yet they go the other way
|
|
around, endlessly complicating their systems over and over again until they
|
|
break. And as you might imagine, the more code a product has, the more
|
|
vulnerable it is to security vulnerabilities. That is the number one lesson
|
|
every developer should be aware of before starting out on their problem solving
|
|
journey.
|
|
|
|
Not to mention the pace at which the developers are forced to work. Data
|
|
protection is most definitely not the top priority for a company as much as the
|
|
process for profiting is. Developers are constantly pounded and pounded to
|
|
create software as quickly as possible. Limiting them with impossibly short
|
|
deadlines and stressing them out. This most definitely leads to security bugs.
|
|
|
|
## Rise for the Money
|
|
|
|
Do we really wish for such use of such a powerful technology? A technology that
|
|
has the potential to transmit GIGABYTES of information every second, yet is
|
|
limited by the SOS (shiny object syndrome) of humans and their will to make
|
|
money by wasting processing power on advertisements, distract the end-users
|
|
with useless popups, make them fill forms, and create accounts to spam them
|
|
with new deals and make even more money? All of that while also collecting in
|
|
bulk all sorts of personally identifiable information? Just to give them the
|
|
content that they needed to inform themselves? Just to accomplish the one basic
|
|
idea that internet, this stunning technology, promised to bring to the table
|
|
since it ever came to existence? How did that happen? How did usage of such a
|
|
technology further push drawbacks against it?
|
|
|
|
The approach that the first internet took, was by far the best at fulfilling
|
|
what we define as "internet" - a place for people to find and share
|
|
information, not necessarily limited by race, background, actions, political
|
|
standpoint, or any other form of bias. Before the companies realized the
|
|
potential of this technology and invaded it with bloat, internet was a place
|
|
for individuals to share information, get to know other people, and create
|
|
something personal. Something private. Something that was a digital footprint
|
|
of the community. That footprint represented people and their will to
|
|
collaborate and share information.
|
|
|
|
However, as companies and governments got more involved, they started throwing
|
|
more and more capitalistic structures into it, which resulted in a slow death
|
|
of the initial goal and reason behind this technology.
|
|
|
|
This can be widely shown from the fact, that blogs, BLOGS, a once subjective
|
|
and private online expression of somebody's persona or presence, are now
|
|
spitting blood to be the top tier result on Google's search page. That
|
|
evidently puts money and power before community, collaboration, and especially,
|
|
*content quality*. Which is quite self-evident after you notice the vagueness
|
|
that most articles have online. The page fills you with popups, advertisements,
|
|
forms to fill, and required login pages, just to access content that is
|
|
precooked by artificial intelligence, is extremely vague, and potentially
|
|
misleading. Yes, it is indeed, a triumph for information scarcity that is
|
|
taking place on one of the biggest highways of information we currently
|
|
possess. And it does indeed, show one of many negative traits of capitalism
|
|
after you throw it into a free cyber space.
|
|
|
|
## Clapback
|
|
|
|
Formerly, to escape this hellish use of the internet, you had to stop using the
|
|
internet. Now, there is a new world that digital rights activists and freedom
|
|
seekers are creating. It is a strong and willingful movement that has been
|
|
standing its ground for many decades. It was in September 1983 that Richard
|
|
Stallman launched the GNU project, whose goal was to create a fully functioning
|
|
operating system and a toolset to work with data on that system. Today, a
|
|
combination of the GNU project and Linux kernel (the core of an operating
|
|
system) is known as GNU/Linux and it is a perfect alternative to the
|
|
proprietary systems like OS X or MS Windows that we do not deserve nor need.
|